VSI Files Channel Order
Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2017 10:05 am
Hi all,
A new magical problem most likely specific to VSI and hot Olympus saves their data has come up recently.
We were testing different compression formats available to the VSI container and found something.
When saving images acquired with an RGB camera with 'No Compression' on the software, we find that the channel order is different when opening it using Bioformats.
It appears that they are opened ad B->G->R and not R->G->B, which lead to a lot of strange confusion, seeing as most formats when saving multichannel images from RGB cameras use the order R->G->B. And when the white balance is well made on the images, it is hard to notice that there is a problem, depending on the stainings.
I've added a dataset which contains a jpeg-compressed example (Opens as RGB as per the jpeg standard) and the uncompressed dataset, which opens as BGR.
http://qa.openmicroscopy.org.uk/qa/feedback/17694/
Again I am not saying that this is a problem with BioFormats but I would appreciate help with the following points.
1. How can I find out using BioFormats Macro Extensions, what kind of compression was used on the dataset?
2. Ideally, would there be a way for Bioformats to understand this particularity and adjust the LUTs accordingly?
Thank you very much for your time!
Oli
A new magical problem most likely specific to VSI and hot Olympus saves their data has come up recently.
We were testing different compression formats available to the VSI container and found something.
When saving images acquired with an RGB camera with 'No Compression' on the software, we find that the channel order is different when opening it using Bioformats.
It appears that they are opened ad B->G->R and not R->G->B, which lead to a lot of strange confusion, seeing as most formats when saving multichannel images from RGB cameras use the order R->G->B. And when the white balance is well made on the images, it is hard to notice that there is a problem, depending on the stainings.
I've added a dataset which contains a jpeg-compressed example (Opens as RGB as per the jpeg standard) and the uncompressed dataset, which opens as BGR.
http://qa.openmicroscopy.org.uk/qa/feedback/17694/
Again I am not saying that this is a problem with BioFormats but I would appreciate help with the following points.
1. How can I find out using BioFormats Macro Extensions, what kind of compression was used on the dataset?
2. Ideally, would there be a way for Bioformats to understand this particularity and adjust the LUTs accordingly?
Thank you very much for your time!
Oli