I just wanted to check how people are using OMERO for analysis that relies on image metadata. Most of my FIJI scripts rely on being able access metadata (like pixel size) in scripts either through Bioformats extensions or by parsing the strings from the Metadata window.
However, when an OME-XML is downloaded from OMERO or opened through the FIJI-OMERO plugin there is a minimum of metadata in in the "Display Metadata" window. There is a little more in the "Display OME-XML metadata" window, but nothing compared to volume from opening the original file in Bioformats.
My questions are:
1. Why isn't the "Display Window" being populated for OME-XML generated by OMERO?
2. How do people get at the OME-XML metadata? I can't get Bioformats extensions to work for images open through the OMERO plugin as this needs a file path.
- Code: Select all
Ext.openImagePlus(path)
-- Opens the image at the given path with the default options.
Ext.openThumbImagePlus(path)
-- Opens the thumbnail image at the given path
-- with the default options.
Ext.getFormat(id, format)
-- Retrieves the file format of the given id (filename).
Ext.setId(id)
-- Initializes the given id (filename).
Is there some other way to parse XML in an imageJ macro?
2. The OME-XML is different for a file loaded through OMERO versus an OME-XML downloaded from OMERO and opened in FIJI. The dowloaded OME-XML has more data in TiffData and Plane information.
3. This may be been covered before, but is possible to export the metadata generated in OMERO by tag and map annotations? It would be a great way to keep the experimental metadata with the images.
Thanks,
Chris