by sbesson » Wed Mar 08, 2017 10:14 am
Hi Anatole,
sorry for the delay in answering.
I have been briefly retested the ticket scenario using the latest OMERO 5.3 development server. I was not able to reproduce any delay using our proprietary pyramidal file formats like Leica SCN although we don't have any samples with similar numbers of Z-sections. As mentioned in the ticket, the issue might be restricted to the case of OMERO generated pyramids i.e. when dealing with files with no subresolutions.
We have not committed any significant time on the OMERO pyramids in the development of OMERO 5.3. This is why the ticket has not evolved and I suspect OMERO 5.3 will not include any significant improvement for your use case.
We will be initiating some benchmark work on the large images building on top on our recent API and performance work. Hopefully, the outcome of this will help identifying the current bottlenecks and work towards modernizing the OMERO pyramids. In this context, your use case is very important and we'll make sure we consider it in our benchmark.
Best,
Sebastien