Difference in metadata for LIF files

[ppouchin]

Hi,

Using OMERO, I've noticed a difference in the metadata between version 4 and 5 of bio-formats.
I've looked at a given file that was imported in the past and compared it to a re-imported version and I think I only have information for 1 channel. The old metadata is 6 times bigger than the new. Is it expected ?
I'm just asking because I noticed that my old script to restore the colors from the LUT is no longer working: only 1 channel is listed in the metadata, which makes it crash...

I have put a zip online which contains the metadata extracted from OMERO: https://grr.gred-clermont.fr/~pouchinp/LIFMetadata.zip

[rleigh]

Thanks for reporting this. I've been able to reproduce the problem with our test data and I've opened a ticket for this (https://trac.openmicroscopy.org.uk/ome/ticket/12237).

Kind regards,
Roger Leigh