We're Hiring!

import issue of nds2 file

General user discussion about using the OMERO platform to its fullest. Please ask new questions at https://forum.image.sc/tags/omero
Please note:
Historical discussions about OMERO. Please look for and ask new questions at https://forum.image.sc/tags/omero

There are workflow guides for various OMERO functions on our help site - http://help.openmicroscopy.org

You should find answers to any basic questions about using the clients there.

Re: import issue of nds2 file

Postby jburel » Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:03 am

Hi Alex

Roger is on leave this week.
He is back on monday and will come back to you with some metrics
Thanks for your support and patience.

Regards
Jmarie
User avatar
jburel
Team Member
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 6:38 pm
Location: dundee

Re: import issue of nds2 file

Postby rleigh » Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:54 am

Testing times are as follows:

Code: Select all
version            import     pyramids   total
4.4.6+ [dev_4_4]   25min 55s   (N/A) 0s   25min 55s
FS [develop]             28s  ~35min     ~35min


I've tested importing with our current 4.4.x code. Note that big image ND2 import is known to be slow--the pyramid zoom levels are computed on the client during the import. The intensive computation required to do this slows down the import significantly. The file size is not the limiting factor here, and the filesystem used server side to store the pixel data is unlikely to have a major effect here. The image is viewable immediately following completion of the import.

Just for reference, the current development code using "FS" simply copies the original .nd2 file directly to the server. In this situation, you can see that the import time is vastly smaller, it now being limited primarily by network and disc bandwidth. However, the pyramid zoom levels are now computed server side, so while the import completes quickly on the client, the image is not actually viewable for a while after until this is complete. The speed is limited by the server hardware and the load on the server. In this case, you can see it's a bit slower than before since the CPU in my machine is probably a bit faster than the loaded server.


Regards,
Roger
User avatar
rleigh
 
Posts: 217
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 11:45 am

Previous

Return to User Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest